Ooooh, this is really a tough one. As pointed out by the always helpful Jeff Jarvis at BuzzMachine, Jill Abramson, a NY Times editor, writes an opinion piece about how we should stop making a big deal out of the first woman (insert job title here). According to both Jeff and Jill (sounds like a fairy tale couple), pointing it out every time a woman moves into a profession/holds a title for the first time implies that we should be surprised a woman is able to do such a thing, which is (they say) insulting. I’m not so sure I’m comfortable with that. Commemorating such advancements, when it is a significant step, like Katie Couric becoming the first woman to anchor a network newscast solo, is worthwile and, to most people, doesn’t signify a sense of shock that women are advancing, but a sense of celebration that they are. I don’t think women’s equality has advanced so far that we are safe to make the world gender-neutral. Forgetting that women are still, STILL, taking their first steps into some of the world’s most powerful positions–and have yet to take steps into others–is like pretending everything is fine and dandy and we’re all on an equal playing field. We’re not. Not just yet.
Top Posts
Blogroll
Tweets, Yo
- @Luke021 I never said you were a stalker or a creep... 15 minutes ago
- @Luke021 Hmm... unless they follow both of us, they won't be seeing replies passed back and forth in their timelines. Just on our profiles. 16 minutes ago
- @Luke021 The point is that abortion doctors do save lives. 19 minutes ago
- @Luke021 I didn't say it happened most of the time. "Often" is a relative term. 19 minutes ago
- @Luke021 Why don't you want to discuss openly? We've debate abortion plenty before. 21 minutes ago

1 comment
Comments feed for this article
April 11, 2006 at 6:07 pm
Sharon Meraz
I could not disagree more with these people who say that gender is neutral. Gender has always been a barrier to female advancement, and though it would be great if we could ignore it (like race), saying our society is gender neutral is like saying power has no effects.
The world of traditional journalism is full of gender-laden examples–from the choices of anchors (white, male) to the choices of which bloggers are deemed powerful, significant, and authoritative (white, male). So, thought it would be great to forget gender, I think it is highly significant that we now have a female anchor.
Maybe women viewers will now identify with news and come to see value through representations of themselves in positions of power and authority. As they say, we all need a little mentoring.